BCSS Steps in to Bridge the Gap Between Inmates and Staff at Correctional Facilities
My name is Tara McCaffery and I have been working as a Regional Educator with BCSS for the past three years. My interest in the field of mental...
“EXTENDED LEAVE, COMMUNITY TREATMENT ORDERS, AND CONTINUITY OF CARE”
Persons with severe mental illness have a fundamental right to treatment, even if at times the treatment may not be completely voluntary (1). Appropriate and humane community treatment-placement decisions, set as conditions for “extended leave” as defined in the B.C. Mental Health Act, can help address these concerns (2,3).
It is a fact that many people with schizophrenia, even when stabilized on medication, continue to lack insight and awareness about the importance of continuing treatment. Since there is now increasing evidence which shows that early diagnosis, stabilization, and continuing treatment for patients who are ill with schizophrenia considerably improves individual prognosis (4, 5), every effort should be made to see that successful treatment, once begun, is continued.
Research studies show that while receiving medication, people with schizophrenia are not ordinarily violent—in fact, they tend to be somewhat less violent than other people (6). Research and documentation also confirm:
Provisions for conditional release defined as “extended leave” in Sections 31-33 of the B.C. Mental Health Act could help to reduce the incidence of these tragedies.
Extended leave as defined in the present Act provides a mechanism for the release of an inpatient from hospital to community care before the expiration of an existing committal order. It is available at the discretion of the director of the hospital psychiatric facility (8).
As such, extended leave provides for conditional release that can be tied to continued participation in a comprehensive treatment plan within the community. The present B.C. Act makes no provision for any other form of outpatient committal.
The type of conditional release defined as extended leave in the Act is not presently being used in most parts of British Columbia. Where it is being used (for example, in Victoria) it is successful. This is at least partially due to the fact that the hospital concerned has written policy regarding extended leave. The results of this policy are considered beneficial to both the patients and the immediate community.
It is not entirely clear why extended leave is not being similarly used in other jurisdictions throughout the province. Generally, it is thought to be due to perceived liability protections and weak enforcement mechanisms. These factors must be re-examined (9).
In addition, however, a written statement of hospital policy regarding extended leave is obviously a useful first step, in that it sets out conditions of professional responsibility under which hospital and community treatment physicians agree to cooperate in the best interests of the patient.
In 1992, the BCSS voiced its concern over undue focus by the medical profession on the criterion of dangerousness in the Mental Health Act (10). Since that time, the ruling of Justice Ian Donald of the B.C. Supreme Court (June 17, 1993) in the McCorkell case has helped to change this focus, by making it clear that “unlike incarceration in the criminal justice system, involuntary committal is primarily directed to the benefit of the individual so that they will regain their health.”
Strong emphasis must continue to be placed on the fact that previous liability concerns among medical professionals who are mandated to accept responsibility for treating patients are now unjustified. This is particularly important in the light of the growing evidence showing that early intervention, close follow-up, and continued stabilization on medication greatly improves the prognosis of the individual who is diagnosed with schizophrenia.
The perception of “weak enforcement mechanisms” with respect to extended leave as set out in the B.C. Mental Health Act is inaccurate. Enforcement mechanisms regarding extended leave are specific. Section 33 of the Act states that the release of a patient on leave does not impair authority for detention if the conditions for such release are not met. It also sets out procedures to be followed by all authorities.
Many British Columbia police officers are presently frustrated in their efforts to protect people with chronic mental illness who are in a state of mental deterioration. Without cooperation and direction from physicians and hospital authorities, it is difficult for the police to help such individuals.
If hospital policy includes provisions for extended leave that are clearly written and understood, there is no reason to anticipate enforcement difficulties.
While families remain the largest group caregivers in the community, this burden has not been accompanied by the support they need. Thus, they are in the position of having responsibility for their ill relatives, yet often have great difficulty gaining access to adequate services, policy input, decision making, or resources.
This situation must change. The extended leave provision of the present Mental Health Act can and should be used to provide specific and enforceable community treatment. In addition, the government should develop and introduce separate legislation for community treatment orders, similar to that instituted by the Province of Saskatchewan’s Bill 87 (11).
Good community treatment, combined with more cooperative and assertive case management – including quality community care (housing, rehabilitation and outreach services) – would help to alleviate much of the suffering of people with serious mental illness.
The Society urges that
Education about schizophrenia is necessary to gain understanding and support for the proposed policy position. State-of-the-art continuing education programs should be mandatory for all health care providers, especially psychiatrists (12). Consumer and family-member educators, as well as mental health practitioners, should be used to help deliver these programs. Certification in mental disorders education should also be required for all judges, lawyers and justice personnel who work with people with mental illness.
In order to improve the effectiveness of the present B.C. Mental Health Act and to facilitate future legislative changes, the B.C.S.S. should assume responsibility for a comprehensive and continuing study of additional forms of outpatient committal to community treatment, based on current research and practices in other jurisdictions within Canada, the United States, and Great Britain.
1. Lamb, HR, Mills, MJ: Needed changes in the law and procedure for the chronically ill. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 37:475-480, 1986
2. Lamb, HR: Deinstitutionalization at the crossroads. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 39:941-945, 1988 and Lessons learned from deinstitutionalization in the United States. British Journal of Psychiatry 162:587-592, 1993
3. Swartz, M, Burns, B, et al. New Directions in Research on Involuntary Outpatient Commitment, Psychiatric Services. Psychiatric Services 46:4: 381-385, 1995
4. Jones, BD. New Psychopharmacology in the Context of Positive and Negative Schizophrenia Symptoms. 1st Annual Schizophrenia Day Conference, June 7, 1995
5. McGorry, P. Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre. Australasian Psychiatry:1:1:31-34, 1993
6. Torrey, E F: In Reply, On Violence and Mental Illness. Psychiatric Services 46:4: 407, 408, 1995
7. Keefe, R, Harvey P: Understanding Schizophrenia: A Guide to the New Research on Causes and Treatment. Maxwell MacMillan, Toronto, 1994
8. British Columbia Mental Health Act, Part 3, sections 31 – 36
9. Kaplan, RJ: New Survey Assesses Outpatient Commitment. RJ Kaplan and E.Fuller Torrey. NAMI Advocate, 12, Jan/Feb 1995
10. B.C. Schizophrenia Society: Response to the B.C. Ministry of Health. Discussion Paper on Mental Health Legislation, September, 1992
11. Province of Saskatchewan: Bill 87, April, 1994
12. Packer, S, Prendergast, P, et al. Psychiatric Residents’ Attitudes Toward Patients With Chronic Mental Illness. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 45:11: 1117-1121, 1994
BRITISH COLUMBIA SCHIZOPHRENIA SOCIETY
EXTENDED LEAVE, COMMUNITY TREATMENT ORDERS, AND CONTINUITY OF CARE
It is the position of the British Columbia Schizophrenia Society that provisions for extended leave in the British Columbia Mental Health Act should be reflected in specific written hospital policy for community treatment.
The BCSS believes that specific written directives for community treatment under provisions for extended leave in the Act would greatly improve preventive care throughout the province.
Extended leave is an important tool which can help alleviate the problem of chronically ill patients who lack the insight to continue treatment after they are released from hospital. Conditional release under extended leave provisions allows for stabilization of such patients, and ultimately improves their prognosis. As an added benefit, written policy for institutions regarding extended leave would ultimately (i) strengthen cooperation between hospitals and community care teams; (ii) decrease the frequency of hospital use; and (iii) reduce the incidence of violence.
The provision in the British Columbia Mental Health Act for extended leave should be particularly applicable in cases where individuals repeatedly require rehospitalization because of their failure to follow treatment plans. This provision allows for readmission to hospital if required without the formality of a new committal.
I. The British Columbia Schizophrenia Society strongly urges the Ministry of Health to undertake the following:
To immediately begin to support and to enforce already-existing provisions for extended leave as conditional release to community psychiatric care and treatment under the B.C. Mental Health Act , Sections 31 to 33.
To require that Directors of British Columbia psychiatric hospital facilities provide specific written policy regarding the use of extended leave provisions under the Mental Health Act.
II. The British Columbia Schizophrenia Society also urges the provincial government to develop and enact additional legislation for community treatment orders.
Policy statement and recommendations are based on background Discussion Paper—Extended Leave, Community Treatment Orders, and Continuing Care.